Thursday, October 24, 2013

Top 10 Ways to Ruin a Job Interview


Every single person the world over will have his or her own compendium of excuses when it comes to why exactly they failed to bag the job following an interview, though suffice to say it is always somebody or something else’s fault. Not true of course as the only person ever standing in the way of untold success is you yourself, though it is surprisingly simply to blow and interview in its entirety by making what could be described as minor slip ups. With the in mind, the following brings together 10 of the best/worst ways to blow a whole interview, in most cases without even knowing it:

10 Too early or late Most will of course know that arriving to an interview too late is never a good idea to say the very least, for obvious reasons that require no explanation. On the other hand, trying to show eagerness by arriving incredibly early can in fact have an equally detrimental effect on your chances. Indeed, not only will it likely be interpreted that you have no realistic ability of keeping to a sensible timeframe, but it is also never a good idea to let your potential employer believe you have far too much free time on your hands…even if you do!






 

9 Career path clashes We are all told to be ambitious and talk confidently about where we would like to see ourselves in the future, though if this happens to be in a bigger, better place above and beyond the realms of this particular post, it may be best to hold back a little. No employer wants to feel they are a stepping stone in your much more grandiose plan, therefore be careful not to flag up clashes of interest.

8 Cracking jokes Actually, this is something that can either make or break an interview as the ideally suited joke that really hits the nail on the head could make all the difference in the world. Sadly, this is the case in about one out of every thousands attempts with the rest breeding the most awkward and hideous aftermath most could possibly imagine. As such, unless you really want to roll the dice and hope you don’t fall in with the other 99.9%, keep your jokes to yourself.
 
 

7 Sucking up There is something of a fine line between respect and proverbial brown-nosing at a rather sickening level, which far too many will find themselves crossing without realizing it. As a rule of thumb, avoid compliments to anything other than your basic first impressions of the business as a whole. Indeed, even if you do find the interviewer’s tie a quite stunning example of a renaissance mosaic interpretation, you will only creep him out by telling him this.
 
 

6 Insulting old bosses This is a hugely overused tactic in millions of cases every day and can land you in more trouble that it is possibly worth. Of course, on the surface it seems entirely reasonable and perhaps even beneficial to call your old boss every name under the sun and criticize their running of the business as a whole, thus showing your motivation to move on to bigger and better things, right? Wrong, as all this shows is a lack of loyalty and respect that will instantly discourage your new boss from taking you on, as how can they possibly know that you won’t speak the same way about them simply for kudos?

5 Acting like God’s gift Of course you think you are the ideally suited person for the job and indeed you want the interviewer to believe there are none better, but crossing the line into showing off and arrogance will pretty much bring about nothing other than a swift end to the interview, not to mention your chances. Nerves and concern are attractive traits as they show thought and care – arrogance displays a potentially careless attitude that no company the world over would find appealing.

4 Dressing for the beach 
Despite the fact that the business in question markets Hawaiian shirt or perhaps the latest line in flip-flops, this does not mean that you should turn up for the interview looking like you’ve just strolled in randomly from the streets. True, in many cases you don’t have to go overboard, but the number of times candidates blow their chances before even saying a word by turning up in shorts is staggering, not to mention rather tragic.

 3 Dressing for a funeral
On the flipside to the above example, depending on the particular position in question you may find that taking your appearance far too seriously can count you out of the running to an equal extent. If all you own is the funeral suit you picked up a decade or two ago from a charity shop, consider upgrading to something a little more appropriate, even casual if the situation calls for it.

 2 Rehearsing answers
Always guaranteed to see so many interviewers the world over cringe as if hearing fingernails dragging down a blackboard, rehearsing answers down to the letter is simply the worst possible way of expecting a good result when posed important questions. Think about it…if you’ve found all of your answers on the good-old internet then it stands to reason that so will millions of others before you. Showing this level of predictability and lack of creativity will see the application in the trash before it even had a chance to get off the ground.

 

1 Stupid closing questions
The interview has been productive, pleasantries exchanged and expectations are high, so there really is nothing to worry about in the very final moments, right? Wrong, as the questions you choose to ask the interviewer have every potential to blow all positive impressions made so far. For example, ‘I won’t have to work overtime will I?’ or ‘what if I need an extended vacation?’ or ‘Well it doesn’t seem nearly as bad a job as I expected!’ will likely make this the first and last encounter you have with this particular company, undoing every effort made up until this moment and labeling you for life as a bona-fide fool.
 
 

 

 

- See more at: http://top10buzz.com/top-10-ways-to-ruin-an-interview/#sthash.mt9GKuYQ.dpuf

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Improving Workplace Mental Health

A really interesting and informative article provided by Standard Life. This is really good information to know on how to help your staff and watch for the signals that your staff need help.

 

 

Improving workplace mental health

    Considering individual and organizational factors in a comprehensive and integrated approach to prevention
 
In this document
  What can we learn from the SALVEO Study, the most important research study conducted in Canada on factors that contribute to the incidence of major mental health disorders?
• What is the impact on mental health disorders of external factors to the workplace, as opposed to occupational factors?
• What can employers do to control mental health disorders among their employees and limit the personal and financial consequences?
• How to take effective action to deal with workplace-specific factors.
• What are the most effective management practices to promote a healthy work environment?




Employers do not control all factors determining mental health.
 
 
For many Canadians, the workplace stimulates self-development and self-realization. It is an environment that contributes to personal well-being and nurtures healthy self-esteem and work-life balance.

The workplace, however, is often seen as a source of substantial stress; one that contributes to the incidence of mental health disorders, such as psychological distress, depression or burnout. Mental health problems affect nearly a quarter of Canadian workers. Adults at the beginning and at the peak of their careers are the most severely affected by them.

It is standard practice for employers to try and limit the incidence of mental health problems among employees. Preventive measures may include a review of management practices and the implementation of a health and wellness program.
 
How can we distinguish between the impact of determining factors employers can control (management policies, support program, workload) and the impact of factors beyond their control (family life, personal problems, individual traits)?
 
The SALVEO Study recently conducted with the support of Standard Life provides some answers. It highlights the importance of distinguishing between the triggering factors specific to certain mental health disorders. When used in conjunction with a precise diagnosis, research findings can help maximize the impact of health and wellness programs on employees’ health by focusing efforts and resources that respond to the most urgent problems in the workplace.
 
A substantial and increasing economic burden
 
 
 
The 2011 report of the Mental Health Commission of Canada, "Making the Case for Investing in Mental Health in Canada", states that 21.4% of the working population (aged from 20 to 64 years) suffers from a mental health disorder or mental illness. The Commission estimates lost productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism and staff turnover costs Canadian businesses approximately $6.3 billion annually. Over the next 30 years, the Commission conservatively forecasts an overall cost to the Canadian economy of $2.5 trillion.
 
Source: Investing in Mental Health in Canada








A new enlightening study
 
 
The SALVEO Study conducted by professors Alain Marchand and Pierre Durand of the School of Industrial Relations at the Université de Montréal, working in collaboration with researchers at Concordia University and the Université Laval, identifies some of the triggering factors for major mental health disorders. Research findings help determine in a precise manner the role of individual and organizational factors in the incidence of these disorders.
 
This comprehensive research – the most important to date in Canada – provided an opportunity for researchers to address a series of factors which potentially lead to the development of psychological distress, depression or burnout. The research will be used to develop new early screening tools for mental health problems in the workplace.
About the SALVEO Study
 
 
Funded in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé, the SALVEO Study was completed with the support of Standard Life Canada. Standard Life facilitated the selection of participating businesses and organizations through its network of clients and partners. Standard Life employees also participated in the study. Researchers questioned more than 2,100 employees from 63 companies and organizations.

Researchers were interested in validating the assumption that the effects of personal and professional problems cannot be considered separately when evaluating the mental health of individuals. The study addressed a variety of factors, including work organization, family and workplace relations, individual traits, such as self-esteem, and other potential risk factors, such as chronic diseases and alcohol consumption.

Using a questionnaire with nearly 300 questions, the study helped determine and compare some of the factors specific to the incidence of psychological distress, depression or burnout.

The research methodology is significant because survey results from the self-reporting questionnaires were matched with biological indicators, including a measure of cortisol level. Cortisol is a hormone found in saliva and recognized as an indicator of an individual’s level of stress. For the study, samples were taken on two work days and on one rest day, from 401 of the 2,162 participating employees. Five individual samples were taken at regular intervals on these days.
 

The empirical data collected helped validate the relevance of the questionnaires in the identification of the mental health disorders being examined. This had never been done before in the workplace.
Facts and figures
Two years collecting data
• 2,162 surveyed workers
• 63 different workplaces
• 401 sample subjects for saliva tests
• More than 6,000 saliva samples analyzed
65 management practices compared
Psychological distress
Underlies the incidence of more serious mental health problems
Anxiety, irritability and some temporary cognitive impairments
Measure: Score of 3 or more on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
Depression
A clinically-identified illness
Major loss of interest or enjoyment, periods of major sadness and feelings of hopelessness
Measure: Score of 20 or more on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-21)
Burnout
Appears slowly and subtlety
Emotional fatigue, depersonalization or cynicism and loss of effectiveness at work
Measure: Score of 4 or more on the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBIS-16)

Saturday, October 19, 2013

October Specials!

Scentsy has launched the "Monster Monday" promotion.

Monster Monday is every Monday during the month of October.

Up to 75% on select Scentsy Fragrance products, and up to 60% on select Grace Adele products. 

Monster Monday Sale items cannot be purchased using Host Rewards. They will be available for order each Monday in October from 12 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. (PT), or while supplies last. 

Set your calendar to remind you!  Keep your eyes open! you don't want to miss out!



https://jenniferkaiser.scentsy.ca/Scentsy/Buy/Category/1225 

https://ilovehandbags.graceadele.ca/GraceAdele/Buy/Category/1224

Here are you October Warmer of the Month and Scent of the Month!!!



This cute "Scarecrow" is on back order as it was so popular it sold it very fast!!  I have one in my possession if you are interested in it, let me know!

Our October Host Special is this cute little "Snowman" Cookie Jar.  I so want one of these!!!  It's perfect for the holidays to keep your Christmas cookies in for the kids!!



Available ONLY by hosting a qualifying party with us!  Call us today to book your party!  there is still dates available for October.  Our November is booking up FAST however, so if you are looking to book a party November don't delay!

Have you ever wanted to go to Bahamas?  If you join our team you will have a chance to earn a FREE trip to the Atlantis Resort on Paradise Islands!  Come join Matt & I on the beach at one of the worlds most beautiful resorts.  For more information about joining Scentsy click here to visit our site.  Or call me for more information!  You will be glad you joined!!!